Homeemerging issues : biotechnology

 

:: Search

Assessments

Indicators

Observation

Data

Emerging Issues

Agriculture
Food security
Atmosphere
Interacting problems
Climate change
Energy
Risks from new technologies
Ozone depletion
Damage to the ozone layer
New air pollution problems
Nitrogen saturation
Biodiversity
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Invasive Species
Tiger crisis
Biodiversity assessment
Biotechnology
Threats of unintended gene transfers
Consumption
Reducing consumption
Demography
Exceeding carrying capacity
Desertification
Land degradation
Development
Policy, planning and management
Forests
Forest loss
Forest fires
Freshwater
Freshwater assessments
Hazardous Waste
Weapons as wastes
Implementing the Basel Convention
Health
Growing disease problems
Antibiotic resistance from environmental pollution?
Hormone disrupters
Declining sex ratios
Chemical interactions
Air pollution and health
Noise pollution
Electromagnetic radiation
Human Settlements
Disaster threats
Kosovo Conflict Environmental Impacts
Land Resources
Mountains
Oceans
Widespread Coral Bleaching
Coral reefs under pressure
Coastal threats
Crisis in ocean fisheries
Small islands
Poverty
Radioactive Waste
Military waste problems
Civilian radioactive waste Solid wastes/sewage
Waste disposal and reduction
Space junk
Sustainable development
Trade and environment
Toxic Chemicals
Heavy metals
POPs

News

 

:: Threats of unintended gene transfers

Engineered genes may offer vast potential improvements, but they are also more mobile than scientists had suspected. Viral genes used to modify crops can be transferred to infecting viruses (Greene and Allison, 1994). Genes inserted in crop plants by genetic engineering can be transferred rapidly to wild weedy relatives, even over considerable distances, and thus escape from control (Mikkelsen et al., 1996; Timmons et al., 1995). Similar concerns have been expressed about genetically altered animals such as 'super salmon' (MacKenzie, D., 1996). There have been concerns for potential environmental or health disasters caused by genetically modified organisms (Independent Panel on Sustainable Development, 1996). Extra care will thus be required in planning genetic alterations and releasing the resulting organisms. In response to these concerns, government-designated experts adopted the UNEP International Technical Guidelines for Safety in Biotechnology in December 1995.

Biotechnology can also have economic and social impacts. The use of genetically modified temperate crops such as rapeseed in developed countries to replace tropical crop products such as coconut and palm oils could eventually threaten the exports and thus the economies of poor developing countries (Kleiner, 1995a).

Africa Latin America North America Europe and Central Asia West Asia Asia and Pacific

.. References and Sources..

Greene, Ann E., and Richard F. Allison. 1994. "Recombination between viral-RNA and transgenic plant transcripts." Science 263:1423-1425.

Independent Panel on Sustainable Development (UK). 1996. Report quoted in "The fifth horseman." New Scientist, 27 January 1996, p. 11.

Kleiner, Kurt. 1995a. "Altered crop threatens poor nations." New Scientist, 17 June 1995, p. 10.

MacKenzie, Debora. 1996. "Can we make supersalmon safe?" New Scientist, 27 January 1996, p. 14-15.

Mikkelsen, Thomas R., Bente Andersen and Rikke Bagger Jorgensen. 1996. "The risk of crop transgene spread." Nature 380:31. 7 March 1996.

Timmons, Aileen, Eileen O'Brien, Yvonne Charters and Mike Wilkinson. 1995. (Scottish Crop Research Institute) Quoted in Coghlan, Andy. "Far-flung pollen raises spectre of superweed." New Scientist, 11 November 1995, p. 10.

 

© UNEP/DEWA/Earthwatch 1996-2007


 Website maintained by GRID-Europe