Homeemerging issues : hazardous waste

 

:: Search

Assessments

Indicators

Observation

Data

Emerging Issues

Agriculture
Food security
Atmosphere
Interacting problems
Climate change
Energy
Risks from new technologies
Ozone depletion
Damage to the ozone layer
New air pollution problems
Nitrogen saturation
Biodiversity
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Invasive Species
Tiger crisis
Biodiversity assessment
Biotechnology
Threats of unintended gene transfers
Consumption
Reducing consumption
Demography
Exceeding carrying capacity
Desertification
Land degradation
Development
Policy, planning and management
Forests
Forest loss
Forest fires
Freshwater
Freshwater assessments
Hazardous Waste
Weapons as wastes
Implementing the Basel Convention
Health
Growing disease problems
Antibiotic resistance from environmental pollution?
Hormone disrupters
Declining sex ratios
Chemical interactions
Air pollution and health
Noise pollution
Electromagnetic radiation
Human Settlements
Disaster threats
Kosovo Conflict Environmental Impacts
Land Resources
Mountains
Oceans
Widespread Coral Bleaching
Coral reefs under pressure
Coastal threats
Crisis in ocean fisheries
Small islands
Poverty
Radioactive Waste
Military waste problems
Civilian radioactive waste Solid wastes/sewage
Waste disposal and reduction
Space junk
Sustainable development
Trade and environment
Toxic Chemicals
Heavy metals
POPs

News

 

:: Weapons as wastes

As military tensions diminish and disarmament agreements are implemented, there has been a growing recognition of the enormous problem with the disposal of obsolete weapons, particularly nerve gas and chemical weapons stockpiles and nuclear weapons, which were never designed with safe disposal in mind. The combination of explosives and highly dangerous chemicals, often deteriorating and becoming increasingly unstable, makes dismantling such weapons, neutralizing their contents, and even transporting them to disposal facilities, both extremely expensive and environmentally risky. The US alone has over 30,000 tons of chemical weapons whose disposal could cost at least $12 billion (Smolowe, 1996). More than 50 ocean and inland lake sites across the US contain explosive items, and harbours and beaches at the site of old battles throughout the world are riddled with unexploded bombs (Knight, 1998).

While Russia has never made any formal admission, there is evidence that the Soviet Union dumped 150 000 tons of mustard agent and other chemical weapons in the Barents and Kara Seas between 1945 and 1982. It is unlikely that anything more than local damage resulted, as chemicals break down in seawater. However, the water is close to freezing temperature, and arsenic is more persistent. Given the enormous investment in armaments around the world, the problem of military waste can only increase. (MacKenzie, 1998)

Africa Latin America North America Europe and Central Asia West Asia Asia and Pacific

.. References and Sources..

Knight, Jonathan. 1998. Quoted in "Bombs Away". New Scientist, 13 June 1998, p. 6.

MacKenzie, Debora. 1998. "Plumbing the depths of the Cold War". New Scientist, 14 February 1998.

Smolowe, Jill. 1996. "Chemical time bombs." Time, 12 February 1996.

 

 

© UNEP/DEWA/Earthwatch 1996-2007


 Website maintained by GRID-Europe