Homeemerging issues : radioactive waste

 

:: Search

Assessments

Indicators

Observation

Data

Emerging Issues

Agriculture
Food security
Atmosphere
Interacting problems
Climate change
Energy
Risks from new technologies
Ozone depletion
Damage to the ozone layer
New air pollution problems
Nitrogen saturation
Biodiversity
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Invasive Species
Tiger crisis
Biodiversity assessment
Biotechnology
Threats of unintended gene transfers
Consumption
Reducing consumption
Demography
Exceeding carrying capacity
Desertification
Land degradation
Development
Policy, planning and management
Forests
Forest loss
Forest fires
Freshwater
Freshwater assessments
Hazardous Waste
Weapons as wastes
Implementing the Basel Convention
Health
Growing disease problems
Antibiotic resistance from environmental pollution?
Hormone disrupters
Declining sex ratios
Chemical interactions
Air pollution and health
Noise pollution
Electromagnetic radiation
Human Settlements
Disaster threats
Kosovo Conflict Environmental Impacts
Land Resources
Mountains
Oceans
Widespread Coral Bleaching
Coral reefs under pressure
Coastal threats
Crisis in ocean fisheries
Small islands
Poverty
Radioactive Waste
Military waste problems
Civilian radioactive waste Solid wastes/sewage
Waste disposal and reduction
Space junk
Sustainable development
Trade and environment
Toxic Chemicals
Heavy metals
POPs

News

 

:: Military waste problems

The debate over the management and disposal of radioactive wastes continues with no satisfactory solutions in sight. However as secrecy was lifted from military nuclear programmes, the enormous extent of the challenge became more evident. Revelations of extensive dumping of military wastes and reactors in the Russian Arctic, and of other examples of poor past disposal, added a new dimension to the problem. In 1998, evidence emerged that radioactive waste from 80 scrapped nuclear submarines in the area of the northern Russian naval port of Murmansk had begun leaking into the sea. (Edwards, 1998). Further quantities of wastes will be generated by dismantling old weapons, including 50 tonnes of plutonium in the US, for example (Curtis, 1994). The global plutonium stockpile is estimated at 1,100 tonnes and growing rapidly (Panofsky et al., 1994). There are both technical problems in finding safe storage and disposal sites, and financial problems covering the costs of security, decommissioning, decontamination and clean-up. Cleaning up the environmental damage just from the US nuclear weapons programme was estimated to cost up to $375 billion and to take 75 years (US Department of Energy, 1995).

Africa Latin America North America Europe and Central Asia West Asia Asia and Pacific

.. References and Sources..

Curtis, Charles. 1994. (US Department of Energy) Congressional testimony 26 May 1994, quoted in "Radwaste: DOE considers storing plutonium at bases." Associated Press, 27 May 1994.

Edwards, Rob.1998. "Hot Waters".New Scientist, 9 May 1998, p.11.

Panofsky, Wolfgang, et al. 1994. US National Academy of Sciences report, January 1994. Cited in Kiernan, Vincent. "A bomb waiting to explode." New Scientist, 26 February 1994, p. 14-15.

US Department of Energy. 1995. Quoted in "Nuclear legacy." New Scientist, 15 April 1995, p. 11.

 

© UNEP/DEWA/Earthwatch 1996-2007


 Website maintained by GRID-Europe